Friday, March 11

3/11/05 - Or 1.5/8/03 When converted to the Canadian Calander

It’s time for Jose Melendez’s KEYS TO THE GAME.

1. Jose spent the last two days at a conference in Baltimore (motto: it’s like a baby Philadelphia) on the working poor. As you might imagine, there is not too much to laugh about when discussing the plight of people working full time for just over $10,000 per year, but there was one moment of levity. A policy analyst from New York had scored a huge victory in getting New York Times columnist Bob Hebert to write about his initiative. A few days later, the analyst received a phone call. (Note: All names of people and organizations have been changed to protect the…okay, okay, they were changed because Jose forgot them. Are you happy now?)

Producer: Hello. Is this Joe Smith of the Working Families Project?

Smith: Yes.

Producer: The Working Families Project that was mentioned in the Times the other day?

Smith: Yes.

Producer: I’m a producer at the Bravo cable network.

Smith: Really? I’m so glad to see media taking an interest in this issue.
Are you doing a documentary or a show on the working poor?

Producer: Yes. I’m a producer with a show you might have heard of, it’s called Queer
Eye for the Straight Guy, and we were hoping you could put us in touch with
some of these working poor people who might like to have a makeover.

This presented a dilemma for Smith. On the one hand, it was horribly offensive that this gay equivalent of a minstrel show sought to suggest that all poor people needed was a makeover. On the other hand, who was Smith to make the decision for his constituents? After all, if the working poor are anything like most Americans, what they want most in the world is to be on TV. (Note: Jose truly believes that the American dream is no longer the house with the white picket fence and two cars in the garage. Instead, it is to be on TV. Did you know that according to labor economists, by the year 2037 every American will have been on a reality show? We’re going to have to open up further immigration just to supply us with new television characters.) Smith did the only thing he could, he gave the producer the name of an organization that provides direct services to the working poor and would let the working poor make up their own minds.

Jose can only assume that they declined, and that’s why the producers of Queer Eye decided to go with Kevin Millar instead. Millar may not technically be “poor” or even technically “working” but he certainly looks the part, and that, as makeover shows teach us, is what truly counts.

2. Manager Terry Eurona’s comments that Balki Arroyo would strengthen the Sox bullpen has led some to believe that when all six starters are healthy Arroyo will be the odd man out. Jose can guarantee you that this is not the case. At worst, Arroyo will be the even man out, the sixth starter, and therefore a reliever. As you may have noticed, six is an even number. In order for Arroyo to be the odd man out, he would either have to be the fifth man on a four man rotation – not too likely -- or the seventh man in a five man rotation, and that seventh spot seems to be well secured by Buddhist monk John Ha-lama. Therefore Arroyo is the even man out and Ha-lama is the odd man out. Jose hates in when reporters or so imprecise with the English language.

3. Will the Red Sox medical staff please take a look at David Ortiz – and fast. Ortiz was among the six Red Sox asked to pee in the cup as part of the first round of steroid testing. While Ortiz expressed no concern that he would test positive for steroids, he did say that “All they are going to find is a lot of rice and beans.”

David… Big Papi… muchacho, it is NOT normal to have rice and beans in your urine. Please get that checked out immediately before you find a steak in there.

I’m Jose Melendez, and those are my KEYS TO THE GAME.


Anonymous said...

Key #3: Hilarious.

Bill said...

Enjoy your blog for the baseball and the perspectives on other subjects as well... added you to the Bosox Blogs links on my site and I'll stop by often!

Friends of Hudson said...

Jose, it's your dratted editor here again.

1. While no expert on astrology, your editor is pretty sure that the plural of Gemini is Geminis, as funny as that may look. An apostrophe-S denotes either the possessive ("Gemini's moon is in the third house"), or is shorthand for the verb "to be" ("DJ Gemini's going to be riding the wheels of steel at the Vault on Saturday."

2. In addition to paying a not a lick of attention to astrology, your editor generally avoids hassling you about routine typos, but "Jose hates in when reporters or so imprecise with the English language" is one you might really want to fix, unless this was meant as a particularly deep joke.

3. Keep up the good work.

Anonymous said...

You idiot, of course that was a joke.